Evidence that cancer surgery increases mortality,Part 3

The current-cancer surgery can be considered another Semmelweisovim phenomenon!
(Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis advocated that surgeons wash their hands to stop killing women during childbirth.)
- Manipulating tumor, such as touching and strong squeezing (as in the process of mammography), biopsy or surgery, resulting in a sharp increase in the number of tumor cells released into the blood, with higher probability of metastasis formation.
- The link between operations and the development of metastases were particularly impressive in a reference case: a patient with sarcoma, making metastasis occurred after surgery of primary tumor and each time after four subsequent operations of local recurrence.
- The medicine has long been taught that melanoma is not harming behavior, since the wounds caused almost explosive growth of metastases.
- Metastases can be induced not only harm the tumor, but also unrelated operations in other parts of the body.
- As a tumor becomes ever larger, slower growing, and some observations suggest that eventually ceases to grow.
- Radiation therapy and chemotherapy of tumors before and after surgery were unsuccessful.
- The opportunity to increase the cure rate is by far occurs only once during the development of cancer: namely, at the time of first treatment.


As shown in the following review, studies regularly show that it is better for patients that do not affect tumors. But it's not in the interest of industries cancer, which are invasive treatments financial lifeline. Always appears new drugs and new ways of combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy with surgery - followed by claims that it now found a way to extend the life of patients. Development of methods for early detection and classification of small, precancerous, noninvasive and dormant tumor cancers - tumors that would become malignant to be left alone - some statistics may indeed indicate a higher cure rates. That has now changed, with an extensive examination developed by the team's leading cancer researchers. Here's the abstract titled "Operation encourage reporting of latent disease in distant breast cancer: The unfortunate truth?".
"We review our work over the past 14 years, which began when we first met with the bimodal patterns of recurrence in the two databases of breast cancer from different countries. In addition to the accepted paradigm of continuous growth of tumors, these data were inexplicable. How To explain the data, we suggested that the growth of metastatic breast cancer usually involves a period of temporary lethargy to the stage of a cell, and in phase avaskularnih micrometastasis. We have also suggested that surgery to remove the primary tumor is often interrupted by drowsiness, leading to the rapid recurrence. It seems that these iatrogenic events are very frequent, because in this way develops over half of all recurrences matastatskih. Assuming this is true, there should be plenty of clear evidence of clinical data. osvćemo Here is the paradigm of breast cancer from a variety of historical, clinical and scientific perspectives and discuss how to sleepiness caused by interruption of the operation and lethargy could be observed and what it meant. In these diverse data can be identified by drowsiness, but most striking is the sudden synchronized escape from the lethargy after the primary operation. Based on our results, we propose a new paradigm for early stages of breast cancer. Also, we suggest a new treatment that is aimed at stabilizing and preserving the lethargy instead of trying to kill all the cancer cells as is the case with the current strategy. "
Bimodal patterns of recurrence that are discussed in this summary indicate that there are two peak time when metastases occur after surgery of primary tumor. The first peak occurs after 18 months, followed by the decline in 50 months and a broad peak at 60 months, with a long tail that spans 15-20 years. About 50 to 80% of all recurrences occur in the first peak.
Recurrences of large tumors usually occur in the first peak, while the smaller tumor recurrences of the same in both the peak. The first peak there is also a structure. Recurrences in the first 10 months are due to micrometastasis that are already there with the primary tumor and were stimulated to grow. This form is most common among pre-menopausal patients with positive lymph nodes, and over 20% of them get a relapse. The rest of the first peak is the result of individual cancer cells that are initially dormant, but they encourage the sharing operation. Another highlight is then a consequence of individual cancer cells that have spread during surgery, and then gradually develop into metastases.
This dynamic also explains the increased mortality of premenopausal women in the third year of the experiment with mammographic screening: metastases appeared 10 months after screening, and that the time between recurrence and death in breast cancer about two years, this means that the death came about three years after screening. I remember being young and apparently healthy patients which had just removed the breast after a mammogram revealed a tiny tumor. She was convinced that it saved what was discovered so early, but three years later she was dead.
Another interesting evidence in this review originated from a Danish report. Forensic autopsy showed that 39% of women aged 40-49 years had hidden and dormant breast cancer, while the risk of clinical breast cancer during their life in Denmark was only 8%. This means that only about 20% of positive mammograms were correct, the rest is or was completely harmless and repaired medical izlječenih percentage, or in other cases, surgery later metastases and encourage these women eventually died because of his treatment.
Here are some more (paraphrase) relevant excerpts from the review:

Will continue ... Print Page

No comments:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...